Dear Politicalman,
a question. I have always thought that the Clinton Administration was the
practical, political embodiment of post-modernism. Now it happens that the
various news outlets at the moment and for the past couple of weeks have
all arrived at different totals in the Democrat delegate count. Is this
lack of agreement to be worried about? In other words, is there a built-in
ambiguity (I'm not talking here about the superdelegates) in the
Democrat-Party way of counting these totals? If there is, I suspect that
the Clintons will exploit such an ambiguity every way possible. Is there
really an ambiguity, and if there is, is this to be worried about?
--Stephen