The critics who bother me the most are those who ordinarily would not be on the side of supporting dictatorships, who are arguing today that only military intervention can prevent the genocide of Darfur, or who argued yesterday for military intervention in Bosnia, Somalia and Rwanda to ease the sectarian violence that was tearing those places apart.
Suppose we had not invaded Iraq and Hussein had been overthrown by Shiite and Kurdish insurgents. Suppose al Qaeda then undermined their new democracy and inflamed sectarian tensions to the same level of violence we are seeing today. Wouldn't you expect the same people who are urging a unilateral and immediate withdrawal to be urging military intervention to end this carnage? I would."
Read it all!
What many fail to see is that civil war is a natural progression to a
stable government. Look, we had a civil war here that killed more people
than we lost during WWII. If the people of Iraq want to fight each other,
THAT'S THEIR PEROGATIVE! Right now, Al Qaeda is playing the United States,
the Sunni and the Shia against each other and they are not smart enough to
figure it out.